Enterprise Risk Management Solutions

An Enterprise View of Risk & Opportunity in International Education

International education is now deeply embedded in the financial, academic, and reputational fabric of today’s institutions. International enrollment, global partnerships, education abroad, and immigration compliance intersect across multiple units often without a unified framework for understanding institutional exposure or strategic opportunity.

As geopolitical uncertainty, regulatory complexity, economic volatility, staffing constraints, and financial dependency intensify, international education can no longer be managed solely at the operational level. These pressures create enterprise-level risk risk that cuts across campus units, affects institutional governance, and demands senior leadership visibility and coordination. At the same time, they can create opportunities for institutions that are able to respond with clarity, alignment, and intentional strategy.

Gateway’s Enterprise Risk Management Solutions provide institutions with a clear, institution-wide lens for reflecting on both risk and opportunity in international education. Grounded in ERM principles and informed by senior practitioner expertise, our approach focuses on exposure, resilience, and strategic positioning—offering leaders a credible, practitioner-informed perspective of where risk resides and where opportunity may be strengthened. This model is intentionally designed as a guided peer conversation rather than a comprehensive institutional evaluation or audit. They are designed to provide perspective, not verification.

Our Services

Gateway’s Enterprise Risk Management Solutions help institutions step back and reflect on international education risk while identifying opportunities to strengthen performance, resilience, and alignment. Our peer reviews are grounded in enterprise risk management principles and informed by senior practitioner expertise across four functional areas: Education Abroad, International Students and Scholars, International Enrollment Management and International Partnerships and Collaborations.

International Enrollment Management (IEM)

International student recruitment and enrollment have become one of the most strategically significant—and institutionally consequential—components of the modern enrollment portfolio. Gateway’s ERM peer reviews explore key focus areas to provide leaders with a high-level perspective on strengths, pressures, and emerging considerations.

International Students and Scholars Services (ISSS)

International student and scholar services operate at the intersection of immigration compliance, student success, and institutional reputation. Gateway’s ERM peer review for ISS provides an experience-informed perspective on how institutions are approaching regulatory, staffing, and service-delivery pressures, while highlighting opportunities to strengthen operational resilience, coordination, and the overall student and scholar experience.

International Partnerships and Collaborations

Gateway provides an experience-informed perspective of the scope, governance, performance, and alignment of the institution’s international partnerships initiatives, including academic partnerships, exchange agreements, and collaborative degree programs. The peer review assesses sustainability, resource alignment, academic oversight, regulatory compliance, and the extent to which partnerships advance institutional priorities and long-term strategy.

Education Abroad (EA)

Education abroad programs present risk related to health, safety, security, finances, partner reliability, and institutional reputation. Gateway’s ERM peer review for EA offers a practitioner-informed perspective on how these risks are currently understood and managed across the institution, while also identifying opportunities to strengthen programming, operations, and sustainability.

ERM Review Timeline

Gateway’s Enterprise Risk Management peer reviews combine targeted document analysis with structured stakeholder consultations to deliver a concise, practitioner-informed perspective on institutional risk, resilience, and opportunity.

Most peer reviews are completed in under four weeks. A campus visit is typically not required.

Launch & Scoping

Project kickoff and confirmation of review scope and focus areas
Request and intake of key institutional documents and data
Identification of participating stakeholders and scheduling of consultations

Stakeholder Consultation

Structured consultations with key institutional stakeholders
Exploration of documented practices and operational perspectives
Identification of perceived risks, pressures, and opportunities across units

Synthesis & Practitioner Perspective

Synthesis of document review and stakeholder insights
Identification of patterns, themes, and areas for consideration
Experience-informed observations based on practice

Synthesis, Reporting & Platform Access

High-level synthesis across selected focus areas
Identification of strengths, potential areas of exposure, and opportunities
Release of findings for institutional use and action planning

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

Materials That May Inform the Peer Review

Stakeholders With Whom We May Consult

How to Think About This Engagement

Gateway’s ERM offerings are designed as structured, practitioner-led peer reviews. They do not constitute formal enterprise risk audits, legal reviews, compliance certifications, or deep technical analyses. Rather, the intent is to provide senior leaders with an informed external perspective based on targeted conversations, selected document review, and professional experience across the field.

These peer reviews are intentionally high-level, selective, and interpretive. They are not designed to validate every process, test every control, or conduct exhaustive analysis. Rather, they surface patterns, highlight areas for consideration, and support institutional reflection and alignment.

Secure ERM Dashboard & Action Planning Platform

For each ERM peer review, Gateway provides institutions with access to a dedicated, secure, and confidential platform designed to support both decision-making and implementation. The platform presents:

The ERM platform includes an integrated action planning and tracking module that allows institutions to:

The platform enables institutions to generate a professional PDF report that can be shared with senior leadership, boards of trustees, or governing committees. This functionality enables institutions to move from reflection and prioritization to execution, while creating a durable governance record that supports leadership oversight, accountability, and future ERM cycles.

International Enrollment Management

When International Enrollment Becomes Institutional Risk

International student recruitment and enrollment has become one of the most strategically significant components of the modern enrollment portfolio shaping institutional finances, academic vitality, and global positioning. At the same time, shifting geopolitics, visa uncertainty, market concentration, staffing constraints, regulatory complexity, and overreliance on limited recruitment channels have increased institutional exposure.

Gateway’s International Enrollment Management (IEM) peer review is designed to help institutions understand where risk exists and where opportunity is underleveraged. Grounded in enterprise risk management principles, the review provides senior leaders with a high-level, practitioner-informed perspective of how international enrollment risk is distributed—and where strategic adjustments can strengthen resilience, diversify markets, and improve long-term outcomes.

Why an Enterprise Risk Management IEM Peer Review-and Why Now

Most institutions can report how many international students they enroll. Far fewer can clearly articulate where their greatest international enrollment risks and opportunities actually reside—whether those conditions are manageable, structural, or emerging or how prepared the institution is to respond to rapid change.

As international enrollment has grown in importance, its academic, financial, and student success implications have transformed it from an operational concern into a strategic, enterprise-level issue. Decisions made—or deferred—today can either constrain future options or unlock new pathways for growth, diversification, and institutional resilience. An enterprise-level peer review provides leaders with the clarity needed to better understand exposure while considering opportunities.

10 Critical Focus Areas: Risk and Opportunity

Gateway’s International Enrollment Management (IEM) peer reviews assess 10 critical focus areas that help frame discussion around exposure, alignment and opportunity. Six core focus areas are included in every peer review. Institutions are invited to select four additional focus areas, allowing the review to align with institutional priorities and emerging risk conditions.

Core Focus Areas

Governance & Decision Making

How international enrollment strategy, risk ownership, investment authority, and accountability are structured at the senior leadership level. Strong governance enables coordinated action and timely adjustment, while weak governance increases fragmentation, delay, and unmanaged exposure.

Recruitment Goals & Strategy

How clearly recruitment objectives are defined, prioritized, and aligned with institutional capacity, academic strategy, and financial goals. Strong alignment improves focus and predictability, while misalignment creates volatility and unrealistic growth expectations.

Target Market & Market Differentiation

How markets are selected, balanced, and differentiated across regions and segments. Market concentration increases vulnerability, while diversified and well-positioned portfolios improve resilience and competitive advantage.

Recruitment Methodology

How recruitment activities are executed across travel, digital engagement, partnerships, and conversion practices. Sustainable models improve efficiency and scalability, while overreliance or inefficiency increases operational and financial risk.

Financial Dependency & Revenue Exposure

How dependent institutional revenue and budget planning are on international enrollment performance. Managed dependency supports sustainability and investment planning, while unmanaged exposure amplifies volatility and institutional vulnerability.

Admissions & Processing Capacity

How staffing models, systems, workflows, and technology support recruitment volume, service expectations, and regulatory reliability. Strong capacity enables growth and responsiveness, while bottlenecks constrain performance and increase compliance risk.

Additional Focus Areas

In addition to the six core focus areas, institutions may select four additional focus areas from the following, allowing the peer review to align the review with specific institutional priorities and emerging risk conditions.

Financial Aid & Scholarships

How scholarship strategy influences recruitment competitiveness, yield performance, budget sustainability, and market positioning. Misaligned aid can create financial strain or distortion, while strategic aid improves access and predictability.

Academic Program Capacity, Structure & Progression

How academic capacity, program design, sequencing, and time-to-degree align with enrollment objectives. Structural constraints limit scalability and student success, while strong alignment supports growth and academic quality.

Student Success & Retention

How academic support, advising, engagement, and progression practices influence persistence, outcomes, and institutional reputation. Weak outcomes increase reputational and financial risk, while strong retention improves sustainability and student value.

Agent & Third-Party Partner Strategy

How external partners are selected, governed, monitored, and evaluated for quality, compliance, and performance. Weak oversight increases reputational and regulatory exposure, while strong governance improves scalability and market reach.

Digital Recruitment Infrastructure & CRM Utilization

How CRM platforms, automation tools, analytics, and AI capabilities support visibility, segmentation, forecasting, and decision-making. Immature systems limit insight and scale, while mature platforms enable efficiency and strategic agility.

Brand Positioning & Global Visibility

How institutional reputation, messaging, differentiation, and digital presence shape awareness and competitiveness across markets. Weak positioning reduces conversion and resilience, while strong branding supports long-term demand and recognition.

Pipeline Development & Pathway Strategy

How feeder relationships, pathway programs, articulation models, and sponsored pipelines diversify and stabilize long-term enrollment. Overdependence increases vulnerability, while diversified pipelines improve predictability and growth capacity.

Insurance Protocols

How insurance policies, vendor relationships, waiver enforcement, and communication practices mitigate institutional liability and student risk while supporting continuity and institutional confidence.

Visa & Regulatory Exposure

How exposed the institution is to visa policy shifts, processing delays, geopolitical instability, and regulatory compliance risk. Strong readiness and communication practices improve continuity, while weak preparation amplifies disruption and reputational exposure.

International Students and Scholars (ISSS)

Assessing Risk and Resilience in International Student and Scholar Services

International student and scholar services operate at the intersection of immigration regulatory compliance, student wellbeing, and institutional reputation. As regulatory scrutiny increases, geopolitical volatility intensifies, and staffing constraints persist, ISSS functions now carry significant enterprise-level risk related to legal exposure, operational continuity, and crisis response.

Gateway’s ISSS Enterprise Risk Management peer review provides senior leaders with a concise, experience-informed perspective of how immigration compliance, service delivery, governance, and operational capacity risk are distributed across the institution — and where alignment, coordination, or attention may be beneficial.

Why an Enterprise Risk Management ISSS Peer Review-and Why Now

Most institutions can confirm whether they are meeting baseline immigration compliance requirements. Far fewer can clearly articulate where their greatest institutional exposure exists across regulatory interpretation, audit readiness, staffing continuity, crisis preparedness, data governance, insurance protocols, vendor dependency, and interdepartmental coordination or how resilient those systems are under sustained pressure.

As international student and scholar populations grow in scale and complexity, ISSS risk increasingly extends beyond the international office into legal affairs, public safety, housing, academic units, health services, human resources, and senior leadership decision-making. An enterprise-level peer review enables institutions to move beyond fragmented compliance management toward coordinated risk governance, proactive mitigation, and sustainable service delivery.

10 Critical Focus Areas: Risk and Opportunity

Gateway’s International Students and Scholars (ISSS) peer reviews assess 10 critical focus areas that help frame discussion around exposure, alignment and opportunity. Six core focus areas are included in every peer review. Institutions are invited to select four additional focus areas, allowing the review to align with institutional priorities and emerging risk conditions.

Core Focus Areas

Governance & Decision Making

How responsibility for immigration compliance, policy interpretation, escalation, and decision authority is structured across the institution, including leadership visibility and cross-unit coordination. Strong governance reduces fragmented risk while enabling faster, more consistent decision-making.

Regulatory Compliance Management

How federal immigration regulations are interpreted, implemented, documented, and monitored, including audit readiness and regulatory change management. Effective compliance protects the institution while strengthening credibility and operational confidence.

Financial Exposure & Fee Structures

How fees, staffing investments, vendor costs, and cost recovery models support operational sustainability. Sound financial models reduce budget volatility while enabling reinvestment and service improvement.

Crisis Preparedness & Incident Response

How prepared the institution is to respond to immigration disruptions, student emergencies, sudden policy shifts, geopolitical events, and regulatory escalation. Strong preparedness limits exposure while strengthening institutional confidence and continuity.

Data Integrity & Records Management

How immigration records, documentation, privacy controls, and audit trails are governed and maintained. Strong data practices reduce regulatory exposure while enabling better reporting, transparency, and decision-making.

Technology Systems & Case Management

How reliable, integrated, secure, and scalable technology platforms support compliance and service delivery. Effective systems reduce operational friction while enabling automation, analytics, and service modernization.

Additional Focus Areas

Policy Design & Institutional Alignment

How institutional policies affecting international students and scholars are aligned across academic, employment, housing, and conduct domains. Alignment reduces confusion and compliance risk while improving consistency and fairness.

Scholar Management & Faculty Engagement

How visiting scholars are sponsored, supervised, and supported in partnership. Effective models must be resilient to shifting regulatory and compliance expectations while strengthening research productivity and academic engagement.

Student Wellbeing & Support Integration

How international students access health, counseling, housing, disability services, and campus safety through coordinated systems. Strong integration reduces continuity risk while improving student success and retention.

Service Delivery & Student Experience

How accessible, responsive, and equitable advising and support services are for international students and scholars. Strong service models reduce reputational and retention risk while enhancing student satisfaction and institutional reputation.

Student Lifecycle

How immigration compliance flows across recruitment, admissions, and student services throughout the international student lifecycle. Strong integration reduces duplication, handoff errors, and compliance gaps while improving the student experience.

Staffing Capacity & Continuity

Whether staffing models, expertise, cross-training, and succession planning can sustain service quality and compliance over time. Resilient staffing reduces disruption risk while enabling scalable growth and innovation.

International Partnerships and Collaborations

Governing Risk and Value Across Global Partnerships

International partnerships and collaborations are undergoing a fundamental shift in how they are perceived, governed, and scrutinized. What were once viewed primarily as academic, relational, or faculty-driven initiatives are now increasingly examined through legal, regulatory, financial, and national security lenses. Governments and regulatory agencies are paying closer attention to how institutions engage with foreign partners, particularly with respect to export control, data sharing, employment and compensation practices, and foreign influence.

At the same time, international partnerships including exchange agreements, research collaborations, and collaborative degree programs remain central to institutional strategy, global reputation, faculty engagement, and student mobility. This dual reality creates tension: while partnerships offer significant strategic value, insufficient governance and oversight can expose institutions to enterprise-level risk.

Gateway’s International Partnerships and Collaborations Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) peer review provides senior leaders with a clear, experience-informed perspective of how partnership-related risk and opportunity are structured, governed, and managed—and whether current practices are sufficient in an environment of heightened regulatory scrutiny and geopolitical volatility.

Why an Enterprise Risk Management Peer Review of International Partnerships-and Why Now

Regulatory expectations surrounding international engagement have intensified significantly, and institutions are increasingly being held accountable for how international partnerships are governed in practice, not merely how they are described on paper. Scrutiny now extends beyond newly established agreements to include legacy partnerships that may lack consistent documentation, compliance review, or institutional oversight.

In this environment, missteps can carry serious institutional consequences, including heightened federal scrutiny, audit findings, reputational damage, restrictions on enrolling international students or scholars, limitations on hiring and employment practices, loss of eligibility for certain research funding, or—in extreme cases—threats to federal funding streams. An enterprise risk management review enables institutions to move beyond decentralized, relationship-driven oversight toward coordinated governance, proactive risk mitigation, and defensible compliance practices—protecting institutional standing while sustaining global engagement.

10 Critical Focus Areas: Risk and Opportunity

Gateway’s International Partnerships and Collaborations ERM peer reviews assess 10 critical focus areas that help frame discussion around exposure, alignment and opportunity. Six core focus areas are included in every review. Institutions are invited to select four additional focus areas, allowing the review to align with institutional priorities and emerging risk conditions.

Core Focus Areas

Governance & Decision Authority

How responsibility for initiating, approving, managing, and terminating international partnerships is structured across the institution, including senior leadership visibility and coordination among academic, legal, and administrative units. Effective governance reduces fragmented risk while enabling consistent, timely, and strategically aligned decision-making.

Agreement Inventory & Lifecycle Management

How international agreements are inventoried, tracked, reviewed, renewed, amended, or sunsetted, including oversight of inactive or legacy agreements. Strong lifecycle management reduces unmanaged legal and financial exposure while enabling intentional portfolio planning and strategic prioritization.

Export Control & Research Security Compliance

How export control obligations, controlled technologies, sensitive research activities, and cross-border transfers of data or knowledge are identified, reviewed, documented, and monitored within international partnerships. Effective compliance protects eligibility for federally funded research while supporting secure and sustainable global collaboration.

Legal Review, Contracting & Compliance

How international agreements are reviewed for legal sufficiency, sanctions exposure, jurisdictional risk, and enforceability, and whether contracting practices align with institutional risk tolerance and regulatory expectations. Consistent legal review reduces liability while enabling scalable and defensible international engagement.

Financial Commitments, Gifts & Resource Flows

How financial obligations, cost-sharing arrangements, foreign gifts, in-kind contributions, and revenue flows associated with international partnerships are structured, monitored, and disclosed. Sound financial governance reduces audit and compliance risk while enabling sustainable investment in high-value partnerships.

Employment, Compensation & Affiliation Practices

How employment classification, compensation arrangements, visa sponsorship, visiting scholar appointments, and faculty or researcher affiliations connected to international partnerships are structured and monitored. Clear practices reduce labor, tax, and immigration exposure while supporting compliant faculty and researcher engagement.

Additional Focus Areas

Geopolitical & Country Risk

How geopolitical volatility, government policy shifts, sanctions regimes, travel restrictions, and country-specific conditions affect partnership viability, continuity, and institutional risk tolerance, while informing diversification and contingency planning.

Reputation, Brand & External Perception

How international partnerships influence institutional reputation, public perception, donor confidence, and external scrutiny, particularly in politically, culturally, or ethically sensitive contexts, and how reputational risk is balanced against strategic value.

Student Mobility & Duty of Care

How students participating in partnership-based programs are supported with respect to safety, insurance, crisis response, and institutional duty of care, reducing liability while supporting safe, high-quality mobility experiences.

International Travel Oversight & Travel Policy Compliance

How international travel by faculty, staff, and administrators engaged in international partnerships is tracked, approved, and monitored, including alignment with institutional travel policies and risk management requirements. Effective travel oversight reduces safety and compliance exposure while supporting coordinated, informed institutional engagement abroad.

Third-Party & Intermediary Relationships

How reliance on external intermediaries, foundations, or third-party organizations within international partnerships is governed, monitored, and evaluated, balancing scalability and efficiency with accountability and compliance.

Partnership Models & Portfolio Composition

How different partnership models (e.g., exchanges, research collaborations, joint degrees, co-branded programs, sponsored mobility, international campuses, or virtual collaboration) are distributed across the portfolio, and which underutilized or missing models may present strategic opportunity.

Partnership Reporting, Coordination & Institutional Visibility

How international partnerships are reported, coordinated, and communicated across academic and administrative units, including the extent to which centralized reporting improves efficiency, reduces duplication, and enables collaboration across departments and colleges.

Education Abroad (EA)

Navigating Risk and Opportunity in Student Mobility Programs

Education abroad programming represents one of the most visible dimensions of an institution’s international engagement. While often framed around student experience and academic enrichment, education abroad carries enterprise-level risk related to duty of care, partner reliability, regulatory compliance, and crisis response. These risks extend well beyond the education abroad office and intersect with legal, financial, academic, and reputational responsibilities across the institution.

Gateway’s Education Abroad Enterprise Risk Management peer review provides senior leaders with a concise, practitioner-informed perspective of how institutions are currently thinking about and managing these areas, and where there may be opportunities for alignment, recalibration, or strengthening over time.

Why an Enterprise Risk Management EA Review and Why Now

Most institutions can demonstrate that they have education abroad policies, partner agreements, and baseline risk mitigation protocols in place. Far fewer can clearly articulate where their greatest institutional exposure lies across duty of care, financial liability, partner dependency, staffing continuity, and data governance—or how prepared those systems may be to respond to periods of change or disruption.

Education abroad risk rarely resides within a single office. Instead, it spans academic units, student affairs, legal counsel, risk management, financial services, and others. An enterprise-level peer review enables institutions to move beyond fragmented oversight toward coordinated governance, proactive mitigation, and intentional program design.

10 Critical Focus Areas: Risk and Opportunity

Gateway’s Education Abroad peer reviews assess 10 critical focus areas that help frame discussion around exposure, alignment and opportunity. Six core focus areas are included in every peer review. Institutions are invited to select four additional focus areas, allowing the peer review to align with institutional priorities and emerging risk conditions.

Core Focus Areas

Governance & Institutional Accountability

How authority, oversight, escalation, and decision-making for education abroad are structured across the institution, including senior leadership visibility and cross-unit coordination. Strong governance reduces fragmented risk while enabling timely, consistent institutional response.

International Duty of Care

How student health, safety, security, emergency response, crisis preparedness, insurance coverage, and liability mitigation are designed, communicated, and enforced across programming and operations. Integrated duty of care practices reduce legal exposure while strengthening institutional preparedness and student confidence.

Enrollment Management & Participation Strategy

How education abroad application processes, decision workflows, promotion, and outreach are structured to ensure equitable access and clear communication. This focus area examines an institution’s ability to track participation, monitor student status, and integrate data across academic and enrollment systems. Strong process design supports coordination, representation, and informed decision-making.

Partner, Provider & Geographic Exposure

How education abroad partners, providers, host institutions, and locations are selected, monitored, and reviewed, including concentration risk across regions, countries, or program models. Balanced portfolios reduce dependency and disruption risk while supporting continuity and flexibility. Strong onsite support is also crucial for program success.

Academic Oversight & Curriculum Integration

How academic quality, credit integrity, learning outcomes, and faculty engagement are governed across education abroad programs, and how programs are developed, approved, and embedded within curricula, degree requirements, sequencing, and time-to-degree planning.

Staffing Capacity & Operational Continuity

Whether staffing models, expertise, training, and operational workflows are sufficient to support safe, compliant, and scalable education abroad programming across normal operations and periods of disruption. Resilient capacity reduces burnout, continuity risk, and institutional vulnerability.

Additional Focus Areas

Financial Models & Program Sustainability

How pricing, fee structures, and enrollment thresholds are designed to balance affordability, access, and operational viability. This focus area examines financial models, budgeting practices, and the sustainability of funding models to support operations.

Equity & Inclusive Excellence

How program offerings, eligibility criteria, funding, advising, and support structures address representation of student populations equitably and reduces barriers to participation. Effective models enhance representation while advancing institutional commitments to inclusion and student success.

Student Preparation & Support

How students are prepared for education abroad through risk awareness, intercultural learning, language support, and orientation throughout the program lifecycle. Effective preparation ensures active participation, lower incident risk, enhances wellbeing, and improves learning outcomes.

Data Governance, Technology & Program Intelligence

How data related to participation, incidents, locations, costs, and outcomes are collected, managed, and shared. This focus area examines technology utilization, system integration, and data integrity. Strong data and technology practices enable transparency, and strategic planning.

Faculty-Directed Program Governance

How faculty-directed programs are approved, supported, monitored, and evaluated. Clear governance and faculty engagement reduce liability while supporting academic innovation and high-quality student learning.

International Travel Policy Alignment

How education abroad aligns with institutional travel approval processes, risk thresholds, and travel monitoring systems. Strong alignment reduces duplication, confusion, and unmanaged institutional exposure.

Domestic Off-Campus & Online Programs

How domestic off-campus study and online programming are governed, supported, and monitored for academic quality, student safety, compliance, and consistency with institutional risk standards. Effective oversight ensures parity across mobility and non-mobility learning experiences.

Our Expertise

Gateway International Group offers highly professional and seasoned international educators who bring years of experience in higher education.

Education Abroad

Stephen Appiah Padi

Dr. Appiah Padi is a seasoned international education professional with an …

Ann Hubbard

Dr. Hubbard is a seasoned international education professional …

Camila Nardozzi

Ms. Nardozzi is a seasoned international educator, with nearly 20 years of experience. …

Heidi Soneson

Dr. Heidi Soneson has been active in international education since 1983, serving as Executive Director …

David Clubb

David Clubb has been a visionary leader in global engagement …

Elizabeth Leibach

Ms. Leibach has an extensive and diverse background in international …

Julie Wilbers

Ms. Wilbers has extensive experience advising international students and scholars …

Ling Zhang

Dr. Zhang has an extensive background in international recruitment, admissions, …

George F. Kacenga

Former president of the American International Recruitment Council (AIRC), …

Bryan Gross

Dr. Bryan Gross, VP for Enrollment Management & Athletics at Hartwick …

Samira Pardanani

Ms. Pardanani brings over 25 years of international education experience, …

Marty Bennett

Marty Bennett is an international educator with a career spanning 30+ years. …

Harvey Charles

Dr. Harvey Charles, an international education consultant, has served as SIO at multiple …

Kathleen Fairfax

Ms. Fairfax has been an active international educator for over three decades. …

Sabine Klahr

Dr. Sabine C. Klahr serves as Vice Provost for Penn State Global. …

Vivian-Lee Nyitray

Dr. Nyitray recently served as associate vice provost and executive director …

Our Pricing

Each Gateway Enterprise Risk Management peer review is currently offered at a flat introductory fee of $4,250. This pricing reflects the intentionally focused and high-level nature of the peer review model. These reviews are designed to provide perspective, not verification. Pricing may be adjusted in the future as the model scales and expands. Pricing includes a one-year access to an interactive ERM dashboard.

For institutions seeking a deeper, multi-stakeholder institutional diagnostic with extensive data collection, benchmarking, and detailed strategic recommendations, Gateway’s GlobalScope 360⁰ offers a more comprehensive engagement model.